Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ »ýÁ¸¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ Àå±â°£ÀÇ ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸

Factors affecting the survival of implants: a long-term retrospective study

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2015³â 31±Ç 1È£ p.10 ~ 19
¼Û¼ö»ê³ª, ÀÌÀç°ü, ¾öÈï½Ä, Àå¹ü¼®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Û¼ö»ê³ª ( Song Susanna ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀç°ü ( Lee Jae-Kwan ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
¾öÈï½Ä ( Um Heung-Sik ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
Àå¹ü¼® ( Chang Beom-Seok ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Àå±â°£ »ýÁ¸À²À» ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ÀÌ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 1998³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 2012³â 12¿ù±îÁö °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡ÁÖ°ú¿¡¼­ ½Ä¸³µÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áß 2013³â 6¿ù±îÁö ÁÖ±âÀûÀ¸·Î °Ë»ç°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ´Â 2265°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȯÀÚÀÇ Áø·á±â·ÏºÎ¿Í ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÅëÇØ ¼ºº°, ¿¬·É, Èí¿¬ ¿©ºÎ, ÀÓÇöõÆ® Á÷°æ, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ±æÀÌ, ÀÓÇöõÆ® Ç¥¸é, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ºÎÀ§, µ¿¹ÝµÈ ¼ú½Ä, ÇÕº´Áõ À¯¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀڷḦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ÈÄ º¸Ã¶ Àü »ýÁ¸À²Àº 98.9%, º¸Ã¶ ÈÄ 5³â°£ ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 97.2%, 15³â°£ ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²Àº 95.2% À̾ú´Ù. ´Ü¼ø·ÎÁö½ºÆ½È¸±ÍºÐ¼® ½Ã ¼ºº°, Èí¿¬ ¿©ºÎ, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ºÎÀ§ ¹× ÇÕº´Áõ À¯¹«°¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½ÇÆÐ¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °ü·ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ º¯¼öµé·Î ´ÙÁß·ÎÁö½ºÆ½È¸±ÍºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÑ °á°ú, Èí¿¬ ¿©ºÎ¿Í ÇÕº´Áõ À¯¹«¸¸ÀÌ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½ÇÆÐ¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °ü·ÃµÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

°á·Ð: 2265°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 15³â°£ÀÇ ´©Àû»ýÁ¸À²À» Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú 95.2% À̾ú´Ù. Èí¿¬°¡À̰ųª, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÇÕº´ÁõÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÒ °æ¿ì ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ½ÇÆÐÀ²ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term survival of implants retrospectively and determine the
risk factors associated with implant failure.

Materials and Methods: Of all implants that were placed at the Department of Periodontology of the Dental Hospital of Gangneung-Wonju National University from January 1998 to December 2012, 2265 implants that were followed up until June 2013 were included in this study. Data were collected from clinical and radiographic examinations from previous visits. The information gathered included gender, age, smoking status, implant diameter, implant length, surface of implant, location of implant within the dental arch, surgical techniques and existence of complications.

Results: The survival rate before loading was 98.9%. The cumulative survival rate after 5 years of loading was 97.2%, and after 15 years of loading was 95.2%. In a simple logistic regression analysis, gender (P = 0.016), smoking status (P = 0.001), location of implant (P = 0.020) and existence of complications (P = 0.002) were statistically associated with implant failure and included in the multiple regression analysis. As a result of multiple logistic regression analysis, the variables statistically associated with implant failure (P < 0.05) were smoking status (P = 0.049) and existence of complications (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The cumulative survival rate of dental implants after 15 years of loading was 95.2% and that the variables statistically associated with implant failure were smoking status and existence of complications.

Å°¿öµå

dental implants; survival rate; retrospective study; risk factors

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI